The 25 Best AI Prompts for Summarizing Anything

Summarizing is the most common thing people ask AI to do, and the thing AI does with the least discipline if you let it. A short prompt produces a bland paragraph that hits the obvious beats and loses everything specific. The trick is not in finding a better summary prompt, it is in being specific about what you actually want preserved: the argument, the data, the counterpoint, the quote, the next action, the thing you came for. The prompts below all start from that premise. You tell the AI what matters. It does the compression.

Below are 25 prompts I use for summaries of different kinds. Articles, papers, interviews, books, reports, and Slack walls of text all go into {{clipboard}}. Find the ones that match the kind of reading you actually do and keep them a keystroke away so summarizing becomes a one shortcut habit instead of a rewrite-the-prompt ritual.

---

Download Free for macOS

Articles and long reads

1. Summarize an article with argument structure preserved

I want a summary of this article that preserves the argument, not just the topic. Too many summaries flatten a sharp piece into "the article discusses X."

Here is the article:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A one sentence thesis in the author's voice.
2. The three main arguments supporting the thesis, each with the specific evidence the author used.
3. The strongest counterargument the author acknowledges, and how they address it.
4. The one claim in the article that is load bearing: if it is wrong, the whole thing collapses.
5. The author's bias or angle, if detectable.
6. A one sentence "so what" that explains why a reader should care.

Under 300 words total. Do not use "the author talks about." Use the author's actual claims.

2. Extract the five best quotes from an article

I do not want a full summary. I want the five or six lines from this article that are worth remembering, quoting, or saving.

Here is the article:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The five most valuable sentences or short passages, quoted verbatim.
2. For each, a one line note on why it matters: unusual framing, sharp observation, useful data, memorable phrasing, or specific advice.
3. The single best line if I could only save one.
4. Any sentence that sounds important but is actually empty on closer read (so I do not get fooled by polished filler).
5. A quick note on whether the article is worth reading in full or just these quotes.

Preserve the exact wording of the quotes. Do not paraphrase.

3. Turn an article into a one minute read

I want this article compressed to a one minute read, roughly 150 to 200 words. Not a teaser, a useful summary someone could learn from in a minute.

Here is the article:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A compressed version that keeps the argument, the strongest evidence, and the most memorable phrase.
2. Structure: a hook sentence, the argument, the evidence, the implication.
3. No "the article discusses" framing.
4. Use the author's voice where possible.
5. One specific detail that gives it texture and prevents it from reading as generic.

Length: 150 to 200 words. No preamble. No "in summary."

Research papers

4. Summarize a research paper for a general audience

I have a research paper and I need a summary for someone who is smart but not in the field.

Here is the paper:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The research question in plain language.
2. The method, without jargon, in two or three sentences.
3. The main finding, stated clearly and with the effect size if relevant.
4. What this finding overturns, confirms, or extends in the existing literature.
5. The single most important caveat to the finding.
6. Why a non specialist should care, in one sentence.
7. A flag for anything in the paper that the summary cannot capture and is worth reading in full.

Under 400 words. Do not use statistical jargon without translating it.

5. Extract the methodology from a research paper

I want to understand how the study was actually conducted, so I can decide whether to trust the findings.

Here is the paper:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The research design: observational, experimental, survey, meta analysis.
2. The sample: size, source, and relevant characteristics.
3. The measurement: what was measured, how, and with what instruments.
4. The statistical approach: what tests were used and why.
5. The main limitations the authors acknowledge.
6. Any limitation they do not acknowledge that I should be aware of.
7. A one line verdict: is the methodology solid enough to trust the main finding?

6. Summarize a paper's findings and replicate the math

I have a paper and I want a summary that includes the actual numbers, not vague statements of significance.

Here is the paper:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The primary outcome and the specific effect size.
2. The confidence interval or uncertainty around that effect.
3. The comparison group and what they found.
4. The statistical test used and the p value if reported.
5. Any secondary outcomes and their effect sizes.
6. A plain English translation of each number so I know what it means in practice.
7. A flag if any number looks suspicious: too round, too large, or inconsistent with the discussion.

Transcripts and interviews

7. Summarize a podcast or interview transcript

I have an interview transcript and I want a summary that captures what the guest actually said, not a generic "they discussed X."

Here is the transcript:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A one line description of who the guest is and why they matter.
2. The three most interesting things they said, each with a direct quote and a rough location.
3. The one idea the guest seemed most energized about.
4. An opinion the guest holds that is contrarian or unusual.
5. A moment where the guest said something that contradicts itself or is inconsistent with the rest of the conversation.
6. The question the host asked that produced the best answer.
7. The single takeaway worth sharing with someone else.

8. Extract decisions from a meeting transcript

I have a meeting transcript and I do not care about the summary. I care about what was decided, who owns what, and what is still open.

Here is the transcript:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. Decisions made: each with who decided and what the decision is, explicitly.
2. Open items: things that were discussed but not decided, with a note on why.
3. Action items: who is doing what, by when if stated.
4. Disagreements: any point where participants actively disagreed, and the direction the conversation left it in.
5. Parking lot: topics raised that were deferred.
6. A flag for any decision that sounded more like a suggestion and may not actually be committed.

Do not summarize the discussion. I only want the output.

9. Summarize a customer interview for a research report

I have a customer interview and I need a short structured summary for a research doc.

Here is the interview:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A one paragraph description of the customer: role, context, what they were trying to accomplish.
2. The three strongest insights from this interview, each with a direct quote.
3. A moment where they surprised me (challenged an assumption).
4. Their vocabulary: three specific phrases they used that I should carry into the product language.
5. A tension or contradiction in what they said.
6. The one question I wish I had asked but did not.
7. A short headline for the interview: five words or fewer.

Books

10. Summarize a book with the argument preserved

I have a book (or a long excerpt) and I want a summary that captures the argument and the specific examples, not a generic "this book is about X."

Here is the material:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The core argument in one sentence, in the author's voice if possible.
2. The three to five pillars that support the argument, each with the chapter or section they come from.
3. The strongest example the author uses, described specifically.
4. The weakest part of the argument: where a skeptical reader would push back.
5. The one chapter or section that is worth reading in full even if I do not read the rest.
6. A paragraph translating the argument into how it should change my thinking or behavior.

Under 500 words. Do not list all the chapters. Focus on the spine.

11. Build a chapter by chapter outline of a book

I want to understand the structure of a book without reading all of it. Give me a chapter outline.

Here is the book or its table of contents:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A numbered list of chapters with the main point of each in one sentence.
2. The chapters that are essential to the argument.
3. The chapters that are illustrative but skippable.
4. The order I should read the essential chapters if I cannot start at chapter one.
5. Any chapter that introduces a concept used later in the book, marked so I do not skip it accidentally.
6. A flag for a chapter where the book probably repeats itself.

12. Turn a book into flashcards or study notes

I want to remember the content of a book, so I need flashcards or structured notes I can review.

Here is the book or a section:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. Ten flashcards, each with a question on one line and an answer on the next.
2. Five core concepts with a one sentence definition each.
3. Three memorable examples from the book.
4. A mind map style list of how the concepts relate to each other.
5. A single paragraph that captures the "if you forget everything else, remember this" takeaway.

Format for flashcards: `Q: ...` then `A: ...` so I can copy them into a flashcard tool.

Documents and reports

13. Summarize a long business document

I have a long business document (a strategy memo, a market research report, a whitepaper) and I need a short summary that my boss will actually read.

Here is the document:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A headline summary in one sentence.
2. The three key findings or claims.
3. The specific recommendations, if any, and who they are directed at.
4. The data that most supports the recommendations.
5. The assumption the whole document depends on.
6. A "so what" for an executive: what they should do or decide based on this.
7. A flag for anything in the document that contradicts a previous document my team has worked with.

Under 300 words.

14. Extract action items from a document

I have a document that is mostly narrative but contains action items scattered throughout. Pull them out.

Here is the document:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A list of explicit action items with owner and deadline if stated.
2. A list of implicit action items: things the document suggests need to happen but does not name directly.
3. For each item, the priority inferred from how the document phrases it.
4. Any action item that is contradicted by another part of the document.
5. The one action item that, if not done, would make the rest irrelevant.

Do not summarize the document. Only extract the actions.

15. Find contradictions or inconsistencies in a document

I have a document and I suspect it contains contradictions or claims that do not line up. Help me find them.

Here is the document:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. Any pair of claims in the document that directly contradict each other.
2. Any claim that is inconsistent with a data point cited elsewhere in the same document.
3. Any claim that is stated in different strengths in different places (strong in one section, hedged in another).
4. Any recommendation that does not follow from the evidence presented.
5. Any assumption that is stated in one place and silently relied on in another.
6. A verdict on whether the contradictions are minor editing issues or substantive problems.

Slack threads and conversations

16. Summarize a long Slack thread

I have a long Slack thread with many participants and I need to catch up without reading all of it.

Here is the thread:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The question or issue that kicked off the thread.
2. The three main positions taken, with who holds each.
3. The current state: resolved, still debating, blocked, dropped.
4. Any decision that was actually made, and by whom.
5. Any action item that came out of the thread.
6. The one message I should actually read in full, because the summary cannot capture it.
7. Whether I should jump into the thread or stay out.

17. Summarize a DM conversation for context

I have a direct message conversation and I want a summary of the context for someone I am about to loop in.

Here is the DM:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The topic and the current state of the conversation.
2. What each person wants or is worried about.
3. The decisions or next steps agreed to so far.
4. Any sensitive topic that the new person should know about but treat carefully.
5. The minimum context the new person needs to read to contribute.
6. A one paragraph introduction I could send to bring them up to speed.

Do not paste private quotes. Summarize the positions without names if privacy matters.

Summarizing for an audience

18. Summarize something for an executive

I need to summarize something for a senior executive who will spend 30 seconds on it. They care about decisions and impact, not process.

Here is the material:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A one sentence headline at the top.
2. Three bullets: what changed, what it means, what I need.
3. The specific number or decision they care about.
4. A "more context" section they can skip.

Top section under 100 words. No jargon. No hedging.

19. Summarize something for a technical audience

I need to summarize something for a technical audience who will poke at the details. Surface level summaries will not survive.

Here is the material:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A summary that includes the specific technical details, not generalities.
2. The methodology or approach, stated precisely.
3. The numbers that matter, with units and context.
4. The assumptions and limitations, stated upfront.
5. A note on any technical term that is being used in a non standard way.
6. A list of the follow up questions a technical reader would most likely ask.

Do not dumb it down.

20. Summarize something for a customer facing team

I need to summarize an internal decision or product change for a customer facing team (sales, support, customer success) so they can communicate it to customers.

Here is the material:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A one paragraph explanation of what changed and why, in plain language.
2. The impact on existing customers.
3. The impact on new customers or new sales conversations.
4. Three talking points they can use verbatim.
5. Three anticipated customer objections and how to handle each.
6. The one thing they should NOT say about this change.
7. The specific person or doc to escalate to if they get a question they cannot answer.

Summarizing for action

21. Turn a summary into a to do list

I have a summary of a document, conversation, or meeting, and I want it converted into a to do list with clear owners and deadlines.

Here is the summary:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A to do list where each item is actionable: a verb, a specific deliverable, a rough deadline.
2. An owner for each item, inferred from the context if not stated.
3. A priority for each item.
4. A flag for any item that requires a decision before it can be actioned.
5. A grouping: immediate, this week, later.

Do not add items that are not in the summary. Do not turn everything into a task.

22. Summarize a debate with a recommendation

I have a long discussion or debate on a decision and I want a summary that ends with a recommendation, not just "here are the sides."

Here is the debate:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The question at the heart of the debate.
2. The main positions, each with the strongest argument for it.
3. The weakest argument on each side.
4. A recommendation, with reasoning, that takes the strongest arguments into account.
5. The confidence level of the recommendation.
6. The one thing that would change the recommendation if it turned out to be true or false.

Summary quality checks

23. Audit a summary for accuracy against the source

I have a summary someone wrote (maybe AI, maybe a colleague) and I want to check it against the source for accuracy.

Here is the summary and the original:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. Any claim in the summary that is not supported by the source.
2. Any claim in the source that is important but missing from the summary.
3. Any claim in the summary that subtly changes the meaning of the original.
4. Any nuance or caveat from the original that got stripped out.
5. A rewrite of the most inaccurate line, based on what the source actually says.
6. An overall accuracy score from 1 to 10.

Be strict. A summary that "mostly" reflects the source is not good enough for a decision.

24. Identify what the summary left out that actually matters

I have a summary that seems reasonable but I suspect it is missing something important.

Here is the summary and the original:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. The one thing from the original that is most likely to be missed by someone reading only the summary.
2. Any counterargument from the original that the summary drops.
3. Any caveat or limitation that the summary glosses over.
4. Any specific number, quote, or detail that would change the reader's reaction if included.
5. A revised summary with the missing element restored.

Short is better than complete, but important is better than short.

25. Rewrite a summary in a different voice

I have a summary that is correct but dry, or polished but bland. Rewrite it in a different voice.

Here is the summary and the voice I want:

{{clipboard}}

Produce:

1. A rewrite in the target voice, preserving the content.
2. Specific voice moves I used (sentence length, vocabulary, rhythm, formality, humor).
3. A version one step more extreme in the target direction.
4. A warning if the content cannot survive the voice change without losing precision.
5. A short note on when each voice is appropriate.

Keep the facts intact. Change only the style.